Lab 04

In Lab 4, I used batch script files in Notepadd++ to preform the same hydrological analysis as Lab 3. To start, I downloaded the DEM files and the NUM files for both SRTM data and ASTER data from EarthData Search. The DEM file (Digital Elevation Model) contains elevation data in a raster layer. The NUM files contains the source of each data point in the DEM file, also displayed as a raster layer (for example, the orange areas in the SRTM NUM file represents DEM data sourced from ASTER data).

For a more detailed account of how I downloaded the data, please see the first paragraph of my Lab 03 Documentation

The prilimiary steps in the hydrological analysis were to mosaick the two tiles together into one grid, and then reproject the mosaicked grid into the UTM projection. I used a batch script to preform these functions. I then opened the files in Sage version 6.2 so I could visualize and further analyze the data.

Here are the SRTM DEM Files:

SRTM DEM Visualization

SRTM NUM Visualization

And here are the ASTER Files:

ASTER DEM Visualization

ASTER NUM Visualization

The SRTM NUM file shows that elevation data from the western region of the mountain was sourced from the ASTER data set. Furthermore, the SRTM NUM file shows that the data includes water-masked areas south of Mt. Kilimanjaro.

After reprojecting the data, we are able to look at the difference in elevation data between the ASTER DEM files and the SRTM DEM files. I used the “Grid Difference” tool in Saga to preform this step. The whiter regions represent areas where ASTER data reports a higher elevation than the SRTM data, and the darker blue areas represent regions where SRTM data reports a higher elevation than the ASTER data.

Here is the SRTM data subtracted from the ASTER Data:

(ASTER DEM) - (SRTM DEM)

After the preliminary steps, I preformed a hillshade analysis using the hillshade batch script. To help visualize the findings, I zoomed in on the map on a focus region on the Western side of the mountain. Focus Region

Here is the hillshade analysis of Mt. Kilimanjaro using the batch script with SRTM data:

SRTM Hillshade

Here is the hillshade analysis of Mt. Kilimanjaro using the ASTER data

Aster Hillshade

There is no noticable difference between ASTER data and SRTM data in the hillshade analysis.

Next, I wrote a batch script to preform a hydrological analysis of Mt. Kilimanjaro. The batch script allows the user to preform all the steps in the hydrological analysis in one step, and the functions preformed in this script mirror the functions from Lab 03. Here is the channel network batch script I wrote to preform the hydrological analysis of Mt. Kilimanjaro.The batch script still produces SAGA files for each function in the code, which is helpful so we can further analyze the differences between the ASTER data and the SRTM data.

Here is the difference in flow accumulation represented by SRTM data subtracted from ASTER data:

SRTM Flow Accumulation

Here is the respective NUM files for the selected area:

ASTER NUM for Difference in Flow Accumulation

SRTM NUM for Difference in Flow Accumulation

In this region….

The final product of the batch scripts is the channel network.

Here is the channel network of Mt. Kilimanjaro using SRTM data in 2D and 3D:

SRTM Channel Network 2D SRTM Channel Netowrk 3D

Here is the channel network of Mt. Kilimanjaro using ASTER data in 2D and 3D:

ASTER Channel Network 2D ASTER Channel Network 3D

Discussion

Sources of possible error: The Resevoir: Mapping the flow of water through a resevoir based off of ASTER or SRTM data is near impossible. From the NUM files, we can see there is a resevoir located at the SW corner of our focus area, and varified by a google map search.

Image

The Agricultural Land: Furthermore, there is agricultural land to the south of Mt. Kilimanjaro. Mapping the channel network through agricultural land is challenging because 1) agricultural land is as flat as possible and 2) humans have altered the flow of water due to irrigation.

The Stream: The vegetation around the river bed sometimes hides the natural river feature. This means with satellite imagery, the trees will appear as a rise in elevation, rather than tree cover over a depression in the land where the water is flowing through, which will case an error in the channel network analysis.

Citations: NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems, and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team. ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003. 2019, distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, https://doi.org/10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003. NASA JPL. NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Global 1 arc second. 2013, distributed by NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, https://doi.org/10.5067/MEaSUREs/SRTM/SRTMGL1.003.